Orbán cabinet: Brussels will not protect the EU’s borders, carries out Soros plan

Brussels has no intention of protecting Europe’s borders against illegal migrants, the EU affairs state secretary said on Wednesday, calling a recent remark by the head of European border agency Frontex “disappointing”.

Barna Pál Zsigmond called it “absurd” that the head of Frontex, the agency in charge of shielding Europe against mass migration, stated in a recent interview in German Sunday newspaper Welt am Sonntag that “nothing can stop people from crossing a border, no wall, no fence, no sea, no river”.

“It is rather saddening that the Frontex chief considers the agency he leads overall unfit to fulfil its duty of protecting Europe’s borders,” the state secretary said on Facebook.

He said if Brussels should finally stop insisting on its pro-immigration policy, “illegal migrants would not be able to cross the borders either through the wall or fence, or on sea or river.”

Read also:

• Foreigners replace Hungarian workforce in Hungary – Read more HERE
• Illegal migration: police launch special checks at train stations, on trains, deploy dogs – Details in THIS article

Brussels’ current leaders and the left wing are committed to executing the Soros plan

Zsigmond said “Brussels’ current leaders and the left wing are committed to executing the Soros plan”, adding that it became clear from their recent statements that Hungary’s immigration policy was one of the main reasons of “the political attacks” against the country.

“Hungary has a consistent immigration policy which works, Hungary has not let itself be turned into an immigrant country,” he said.

“We have built a fence, we keep protecting our borders … and we reject the EU’s policy promoting migration,” the state secretary said, adding that the Hungarian government would continue to insist on its sovereignty and the protection of its borders.

Migration problem, not solution

Mass immigration “is the problem rather than the solution”, the state secretary for international communication and relations said on Wednesday, responding to an opinion piece in the Financial Times.

In an English-language post published on abouthungary.hu, Zoltán Kovács said that Gideon Rachman’s piece, In praise of mass immigration, argued that “even without mass immigration, there would be no ‘social peace’; and the lack of immigration would come with immense social and economic costs.”

“Nobody has ever said that without immigration our societies would live in perfect harmony and peace. However, it’s important to distinguish between the types of social conflicts that we Europeans, hailing overwhelmingly from Jewish and Christian traditions, have grown used to managing in the last millennium and the current challenges posed by mass immigration,” Kovács said, adding that the rise of conservative parties in countries hit by immigration was a sign of people sharing the same views throughout Europe.

We are able to fill in workforce gaps

“Secondly, remedying the economic drawbacks of refusing mass immigration is not all black and white … Take Hungary’s new guest worker regulation, for example: We are able to fill in workforce gaps without sacrificing the foundations of our society and culture along the way,” he said, adding that Hungary’s economic success was based on utilising the potential of the Hungarian labour market.

“The liberal idea of welcoming masses of immigrants from diverse cultural and religious backgrounds, who will then seamlessly integrate into our societies, remains a fairy tale. You may not see it from the other side of the Channel, but it’s simply not working,” Kovács said.

To read the full article in English, click HERE.

Source: